Latest Audio Books

 Location:  Home » CD » The Historian  
Categories
CD
DVD
MP3
Meditation
Digital Readers
Bookmark and Share
dracula  gothic mystery  gothic novel  romania  vlad iii  

The Historian

The HistorianAuthor: Elizabeth Kostova
Creators: Justine Eyre, Paul Michael
Publisher: Books on Tape

List Price: $149.00
Buy Used: $31.95
as of 7/29/2010 12:25 MST details
You Save: $117.05 (79%)

In Stock


New (1) Used (11) from $31.95

Seller: Beth's Book Box
Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars 1540 reviews
Sales Rank: 258,965

Format: Audiobook, Unabridged
Media: Audio CD
Edition: Unabridged
Number Of Items: 1
Running Time: 765 Minutes

ISBN: 1415929017
EAN: 9781415929018
ASIN: 1415929017

Publication Date: 2005
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days

Also Available In:

  • Kindle Edition - The Historian
  • Paperback - The Historian
  • Audible Audio Edition - The Historian
  • Audio CD - The Historian
  • Paperback - The Historian
  • Paperback - The Historian: A Novel
  • Paperback - The Historian: A Novel
  • Paperback - The Historian
  • Paperback - The Historian
  • Hardcover - The Historian
  • Paperback - The Historian
  • Paperback - The Historian
  • Hardcover - The Historian
  • Mass Market Paperback - The Historian
  • Audio CD - The Historian
  • Paperback - Historian
  • Paperback - The Historian
  • Audio Cassette - The Historian
  • Kindle Edition - The Historian
  • Paperback - The Historian
  • Audible Audio Edition - The Historian
  • Audible Audio Edition - The Historian
  • Hardcover - The Historian
  • Audible Audio Edition - The Historian
  • Hardcover - The Historian
  • Audio CD - The Historian
  • Audio Cassette - The Historian
  • Hardcover - The Historian

Similar Items:


Editorial Reviews:

Product Description
A teenage girl discovers a letters are addressed to: 'My dear and unfortunate successor.' When the girl confronts her father, he reluctantly confesses his involvement, twenty years earlier, in a search for his graduate school mentor, who disappeared from his office only moments after confiding his certainty that Dracula--Vlad the Impaler, an inventively cruel ruler of Wallachia in the mid-15th century--was still alive.

Amazon.com Review
If your pulse flutters at the thought of castle ruins and descents into crypts by moonlight, you will savor every creepy page of Elizabeth Kostova's long but beautifully structured thriller The Historian. The story opens in Amsterdam in 1972, when a teenage girl discovers a medieval book and a cache of yellowed letters in her diplomat father's library. The pages of the book are empty except for a woodcut of a dragon. The letters are addressed to: "My dear and unfortunate successor." When the girl confronts her father, he reluctantly confesses an unsettling story: his involvement, twenty years earlier, in a search for his graduate school mentor, who disappeared from his office only moments after confiding to Paul his certainty that Dracula--Vlad the Impaler, an inventively cruel ruler of Wallachia in the mid-15th century--was still alive. The story turns out to concern our narrator directly because Paul's collaborator in the search was a fellow student named Helen Rossi (the unacknowledged daughter of his mentor) and our narrator's long-dead mother, about whom she knows almost nothing. And then her father, leaving just a note, disappears also.

As well as numerous settings, both in and out of the East Bloc, Kostova has three basic story lines to keep straight--one from 1930, when Professor Bartolomew Rossi begins his dangerous research into Dracula, one from 1950, when Professor Rossi's student Paul takes up the scent, and the main narrative from 1972. The criss-crossing story lines mirror the political advances, retreats, triumphs, and losses that shaped Dracula's beleaguered homeland--sometimes with the Byzantines on top, sometimes the Ottomans, sometimes the rag-tag local tribes, or the Orthodox church, and sometimes a fresh conqueror like the Soviet Union.

Although the book is appropriately suspenseful and a delight to read--even the minor characters are distinctive and vividly seen--its most powerful moments are those that describe real horrors. Our narrator recalls that after reading descriptions of Vlad burning young boys or impaling "a large family," she tried to forget the words: "For all his attention to my historical education, my father had neglected to tell me this: history's terrible moments were real. I understand now, decades later, that he could never have told me. Only history itself can convince you of such a truth." The reader, although given a satisfying ending, gets a strong enough dose of European history to temper the usual comforts of the closing words. --Regina Marler


Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 1540
1 2 3 4 5 6 ...308Next »



3 out of 5 stars Not for the casual reader   July 26, 2010
S. Pugliese (Philadelphia)
Bottom line: Yes this is a good book. Yes it was well worth my invested time. This book was written with Anthropology and History as a foundation mixed with fiction.

There is really only one way to digest this book. Peace and quiet accompanied by a nice cup of coffee/tea or a nice glass of wine. This is not a beach read, and definitely not a read to squeeze in at the salon. Be prepared to have a little more than basic understanding of Vlad the Impaler. Ignorance will cause you to drop this book. A larger chunk of what this story is about is following the cultures, their traditions, and their superstitions as well as understanding the current political standings during the Cold War period.

After struggling through the first 100 pages of a necessary evil; the story finally picked up pace and got exciting. In the beginning, the travel descriptions are longwinded, but beautiful if you struggle through and stay awake. By the time I became well invested in this story I felt like I was traveling with the characters.

I'm sorry to say that if you give up on this read you will probably save yourself a headache. After refreshing myself curtesy of Google on Romanian culture and Vlad's history, my sickened stomach was refreshed to digest this fiction."



2 out of 5 stars The Literary Equivalent of the Titanic   July 21, 2010
Anthony Rodriguez
1 out of 1 found this review helpful

Spoilers . . . like it matters.
Here's the correct metaphor, I think. To preface, I do not wish to offend any animal lovers, it's just that this is the only metaphor I can think of to describe this train wreck of a book. Let's say you're a hunter. You've planned this trip meticulously and have been out for days looking for the perfect buck. You tracked it, waited for it, and after much patience and work it's finally here in your sights only a few meters from you. You take aim, your weapon is true, and you, yourself, more than have the skill to make this easy, perfect shot at this perfect animal. And it is at this moment that you turn the gun on yourself and shoot yourself in the face. Yup, you just screwed yourself royally and have no one to blame but yourself.
That's my reading of Kostova's "The Historian." Kostova had an absolutely brilliant, impeccably flawless build-up to the denouement and then it ends worse than any fiction ending I've read in the last 15 years. It was the definition of anticlimactic.
Let me at least give Kostova credit for the things she did right. First, it takes a LOT of moxy to want to take on the Dracula legend. Most contemporary writers who do so usually screw it up. Most writers, if they attempt it at all, go about it only obliquely. For instance, King's "Salem's Lot" and Matheson's "I Am Legend" (the two strongest vampire novels in the last 50 years) had obvious homages to the Dracula legend but were not direct attempts at addressing the Count himself. (Ya, we will not mention the Twilight series in my presence, that's a whole other review.) My problem isn't that Kostova screwed up the update of the legend but that she HAD IT and then screwed it up. Christ, I could've written the last 30 pages better than she did and I suck.
Okay, sorry, things she did right. In essence, the first thing she did right was to try to rejuvenate the Dracula legend, which is not an easy thing to do so for that I give her an A for effort. Second, she returned to the roots of the legend, both historically (with the legend of Vlad Tepes) and literary (as evidenced by her use of the original Stoker format of using journals, letters, etc.). This was VERY smart of her and accomplished for Kostova the same thing it accomplishe for Stoker (i.e., drawing the reader into the tale). Third, she tapped into the power of the scholar. This isn't Wesley Snipes in Blade trying to hunt down Dracula. This is closer to the Victorian England Harker or Van Helsing hunting the Count. Kostova made a brilliant twist by making Dracula, himself, a scholar. If Dracula was still around then technically he would be more scholar than warrior. There would, of course, still be that aspect of a killer to him (by definition) but there would also be a strong scholarly side to a man who is immortal and wants power. I think this appraisal of Dracula that Kostova made was an outstanding contribution to the Dracula legend. Fourth, the tying together of different generations (Paul, Rossi, Helen, etc.) and the global nature of the fight against Dracula (Mehmed II's Crescent Guard hunting Dracula through the centuries) was a powerful and effective element in the book and greatly widened the scope of the novel to make it epic instead of provincial. I think this is where previous works that attempted to tackle the Dracula legend failed. Because of its place in fiction, the legend is epic and should be treated as such. Where I believe previous writers fail is they do not allow a large enough canvas to treat such a grand tradition. Kostova did not fail in this regard.

Okay.

Now here's what she did wrong. Her faults are few, but profound, and, in my opinion, completely unforgivable like if President Obama was to show up to a peace conference and b!*ch slap a foreign head of state. I like the guy but Obama, YOU CANNOT DO THAT. Like I said, unforgivable. First, what kind of revenge plot has someone bitterly hate a person and the think, "Hey, I know the best way to get even with my mortal enemy. I'll spend years researching a book that they want to publish and publish it before they do. Brew Ha Ha Ha Ha!!!" What the hell?!?!?! Really?!?!? That's all you got? Helen was a wonderful character, meticulously constructed and filled with depth and passion. So THAT'S your revenge plot for her?! Why don't you have her toilet paper his house while you're at it? Okay, enough of that one.
Second, and most egregious (i.e., this is the b!*ch slap), HOW THE HELL DO YOU END THE SHOWDOWN WITH DRACULA WITH HELEN SHOOTING HIM?!?!?!?! Is that all you got?!?!?! Here's how you end it . . . THE FREAKIN' BOOK!!! This whole book is about books! You even named it. "The Life of Saint George" book that was in Dracula's library that Rossi held onto so dearly. Also, St. George slayed what? A dragon! You end it by Helen and Paul using that book in some way. And you DON'T end it in two paragraphs after we spent 600+ pages building up to it. What the hell?!?!?!
And that is how shooting yourself in the face happens. Kostova actually HAD IT! She had it in her grasp to write THE definitive Dracula story for the 21st century and instead chose to shoot herself in the face in the last 30 or so pages. I wouldn't be near as upset if she couldn't have pulled it off, but I 100% believe that she had the ability to do so. She was SO CLOSE! And for some reason she didn't finish it.
In all honesty, it feels like the first 600 pages were written by one of the greatest contemporary writers or our generation, while the last 30 or so pages were written by a high school sophomore who needs to turn in a report tomorrow morning that he hasn't even started. I refuse to believe that it was lack of skill on Kostova's part because for 600 pages she demonstrated outstanding writing ability. To me, it looked more like laziness or apathy.
I know there was a "hint" in the last two chapters that Dracula, or another vampire, is out there and the fight continues but that did absolutely nothing to salvage this Titanic of a disaster that is "The Historian." So Kostova, you win the prize of best novel with the worst ending ever. Congrats.



2 out of 5 stars I'm bored   July 9, 2010
Lou (USA)
I have only read a little more than one third of this book and I can't get up the gumption to read any more. This is very unlike me. Yes, the descriptions of landscapes and even mood of places and people seem very well done (why I rated more than just one star) but the book just goes on and on and on. Great descriptive writing, great descriptive writing, great descrptive writing, a tiny bit of story . . . A friend who I love discussing books with and who is a voracious reader loaned me The Historian, telling me I would love it. I am a little confounded that anyone could love it, or perhaps I am confounded with myself that I don't love it, but the whole thing is a mystery to me. Well, not the plot (I just don't care) but rather, how anyone could enjoy this book!


4 out of 5 stars Bad bad Vlad.   July 6, 2010
Donald Cornelius (Venice, CA, US)
A retelling of the Vlad the Impaler tale written in a Braum Strocker/European Travel Log way. I enjoyed her writing style and it was fun since most of the places she talks about I have been, down to the café that I sat in at St. Marco Square in Venice, Italy as well as Paris, Amsterdam (blah, blah, blah I am so well traveled). The book was really good, but around 700 pages I think she must have ran out of paper or her lap top battery was low since the ending seemed rather hokey and too neatly wrapped. But I recommend it.


1 out of 5 stars Good Concept, Poorly Executed   June 25, 2010
Ashley Cunningham
1 out of 2 found this review helpful

Given all the hype about "Twilight" nowadays, which makes me nauseous, I was looking forward to something about actual vampires, not the sparklers who stalk stupid teenage girls. I found myself severely disappointed in picking this book up.

The concept of the book was interesting: people discover Dracula is alive and try to find him. However, this concept was very poorly executed. The plot was very boring and seemed to drag on and on with pages of "my father took me to this country, we ate at this place, he told me this bit about Dracula, repeat". I could not sympathize or identify with any of the characters, as none of them seemed to have any real personality or anything to distinguish one from the other, which meant that scenes written for suspense came across as dull and left me feeling that I could care less about if a character dies or disappears. A hundred pages into the book, with several more to go and no end in sight, I had to put the novel down out of sheer boredom. Thank goodness I got it from the library.


Showing reviews 1-5 of 1540
1 2 3 4 5 6 ...308Next »


Custom Search
CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME.
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
Powered by Bytewise

Sponsored Links
Book Stores
Bones Books
Engineering Books